HomeContempt of Court Act 1971MCQ on Contempt of Court Act 1971

MCQ on Contempt of Court Act 1971

Segment 6: MCQs (81–100)


81. Under the Contempt of Court Act, which authority can initiate contempt proceedings in the Supreme Court without prior approval?
a) Chief Justice of India
b) Any Judge of the Supreme Court
c) Attorney General or Solicitor General
d) President of India

Show Answer

82. Which section of the Act discusses the punishment for contempt?
a) Section 11
b) Section 12
c) Section 14
d) Section 16

Show Answer

83. What is the primary objective of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971?
a) To uphold the independence of the judiciary
b) To regulate judicial appointments
c) To punish corruption in the judiciary
d) To ensure the implementation of laws

Show Answer

84. Which case laid down the principle that truth is a defense in contempt cases?
a) Subramanian Swamy v. Arun Shourie
b) E.M. Sankaran Namboodiripad v. T. Narayanan Nambiar
c) In Re: Arundhati Roy
d) Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra

Show Answer

85. Who has the power to punish for contempt of subordinate courts?
a) District Courts
b) High Courts
c) Supreme Court
d) Both High Courts and Supreme Court

Show Answer

86. What does “civil contempt” primarily involve?
a) Scandalizing the judiciary
b) Obstructing justice
c) Wilful disobedience of court orders
d) Criticizing judicial decisions

Show Answer

87. Which section protects publications made in good faith concerning pending judicial proceedings?
a) Section 3
b) Section 4
c) Section 5
d) Section 6

Show Answer

88. Which of the following is an example of “criminal contempt”?
a) Failure to pay court-ordered maintenance
b) Criticism of a judgment in private conversations
c) Disobedience of a restraining order
d) Scandalizing the judiciary through false allegations

Show Answer

89. In which case did the Supreme Court clarify that contempt proceedings cannot be initiated after six months?
a) Pritam Pal v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh
b) Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court
c) J.R. Parashar v. Prashant Bhushan
d) T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Ashok Khot

Show Answer

90. What is the defense for contempt under Section 13?
a) Good faith
b) Bona fide mistake
c) Unintentional disobedience
d) Lack of jurisdiction

Show Answer

91. Which case is associated with the principle that contempt power must not curtail freedom of speech excessively?
a) S. Mulgaokar v. Unknown
b) In Re: Arundhati Roy
c) E.M. Sankaran Namboodiripad v. T. Narayanan Nambiar
d) C.K. Daphtary v. O.P. Gupta

Show Answer

92. Which court can transfer a contempt case from one High Court to another?
a) District Court
b) Supreme Court
c) The concerned High Court
d) Attorney General

Show Answer

93. Which section of the Act deals with the procedure in cases of criminal contempt?
a) Section 12
b) Section 14
c) Section 18
d) Section 20

Show Answer

94. What does “scandalizing the court” imply under the Act?
a) Questioning the authority of judges
b) Making allegations that erode public confidence in the judiciary
c) Publishing judgments without permission
d) Criticizing lawyers publicly

Show Answer

95. Can contempt charges be appealed? If so, under which section?
a) Yes, under Section 12
b) Yes, under Section 19
c) No appeal is allowed
d) Yes, under Section 22

Show Answer

96. Which case emphasized the principle of restraint in contempt powers?
a) E.M. Sankaran Namboodiripad v. T. Narayanan Nambiar
b) S. Mulgaokar v. Unknown
c) C.K. Daphtary v. O.P. Gupta
d) In Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra

Show Answer

97. Who must grant consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings in the High Court?
a) Advocate General
b) Chief Justice of the High Court
c) Registrar of the High Court
d) Attorney General

Show Answer

98. Which of the following is not a defense in criminal contempt cases?
a) Truth
b) Bona fide apology
c) Lack of intent
d) Ignorance of the law

Show Answer

99. Which of the following is required for fair criticism of judicial acts to avoid contempt?
a) Must be made privately
b) Should not affect pending proceedings
c) Must have the judge’s approval
d) Should focus only on lower courts

Show Answer

100. Which case ruled that truth as a defense must be accompanied by public interest?
a) Subramanian Swamy v. Arun Shourie
b) Arundhati Roy v. Union of India
c) S. Mulgaokar v. Unknown
d) Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court

Show Answer

Your Opinion

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!

Read More

Subscribe Email Alert

Loading

Related Material