65. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court raised doubts regarding the
applicability of the doctrine of equitable estoppel beyond Section 115, Evidence Act?
(A) Mercantile Bank of India Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India Ltd.
(B) Madanappa Vs. Chandramma
(C) Turner Morrison and Co. Vs. Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd.
(D) Sitaram Vs. State of UP
Ans.a
66. No revenue officer shall be compelled to say whence he got any information as to the
commission of any offence against the public revenue. This provision is contained in—
(A) Section 125, Evidence Act
(B) Section 124, Evidence Act
(C) Section 123, Evidence Act
(D) Section 126, Evidence Act
Ans.a
67. No confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of
any offence. The rationale of this rule is stated in—
(A) Queen Empress Vs. Abdullah
(B) Queen Empress Vs. Babulal
(C) Queen Vs. Lillyman
(D) Pakla Narayan Swamy Vs. Emperor
Ans.b
68. Where a bill of exchange is drawn in a set of five, how many of them need to be
proved?
(A) Five
(B) Three
(C) One
(D) Two
Ans.c
69. Assertion (A): A gives B a receipt for money paid by B. Oral evidence is offered for the
payment. The evidence is admissible. Reason (R): A receipt is not a contract or grant in
respect of which oral evidence is barred. Codes: (A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(B) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
(C) A is true but R is false
(D) A is false but R is true
Ans.a
70. Assertion (A): Section 91 and 92, Evidence Act should be read together. Reason (R):
These two Sections supplement each other. Codes:
(A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(B) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
(C) A is true but R is false
(D) A is false but R is true
Ans.a